2025 Advanced Stats Previews
Compare college football teams head-to-head with detailed analytics
🏈 | WIN PROB 50.8% PROJ POINTS 27.57 | |
| EPA Margin | 0.267 | 16 |
| OFF | 0.141 | 18 |
| DEF | -0.126 | 19 |
| Off Success Rate | 47.0% | 28 |
| DROPBACK | 43.7% | 37 |
| RUSH | 50.0% | 20 |
| Def Success Rate | 41.1% | 64 |
| DROPBACK | 42.3% | 93 |
| RUSH | 39.6% | 32 |
| Net Pts/Drive | 0.79 | 21 |
| OFF | 2.17 | 34 |
| DEF | 1.39 | 26 |
| Net Field Pos | 2.74 | 24 |
| Quality Drive Ratio | 56.8% | 27 |
Michigan Off vs USC Def
| 0.125 | 14 | EPA/RUSH | 61 | -0.002 |
| 0.129 | 25 | EPA/DROPBACK | 22 | -0.135 |
| 50.8% | 26 | QUALITY DRIVE RATE | 64 | 41.9% |
| 3.38 | 82 | Pts/QUALITY DRIVE | 45 | 3.29 |
| 29.64 | 26 | Field Position | 35 | 27.06 |
| 3.1% | 105 | RROE | 62 | -0.5% |
| 0.126 | 25 | Early Downs EPA | 99 | 0.032 |
| 45.0% | 39 | 3rd/4th down Success | 49 | 38.4% |
Michigan Def vs USC Off
| -0.089 | 16 | EPA/RUSH | 15 | 0.124 |
| -0.147 | 21 | EPA/DROPBACK | 5 | 0.285 |
| 40.5% | 53 | QUALITY DRIVE RATE | 2 | 59.3% |
| 2.97 | 23 | PTS/QUALITY DRIVE | 21 | 4.11 |
| 26.90 | 29 | FIELD POSITION | 118 | 26.50 |
| -2.4% | 33 | RROE | 40 | -4.2% |
| -0.118 | 20 | EARLY DOWNS EPA | 12 | 0.158 |
| 40.3% | 59 | 3rd/4th down Success | 6 | 53.0% |
WIN PROB 49.2% PROJ POINTS 27.15 | 🏈 | |
| 12 | 0.320 | EPA Margin |
| 7 | 0.239 | OFF |
| 34 | -0.081 | DEF |
| 12 | 49.3% | Off Success Rate |
| 6 | 49.6% | DROPBACK |
| 29 | 48.9% | RUSH |
| 101 | 44.1% | Def Success Rate |
| 71 | 40.3% | DROPBACK |
| 125 | 48.8% | RUSH |
| 12 | 1.21 | Net Pts/Drive |
| 6 | 2.96 | OFF |
| 58 | 1.75 | DEF |
| 80 | -0.56 | Net Field Pos |
| 18 | 58.4% | Quality Drive Ratio |
