2025 Advanced Stats Previews
Compare college football teams head-to-head with detailed analytics
🏈 | WIN PROB 64.6% PROJ POINTS 28.21 | |
| EPA Margin | 0.362 | 6 |
| OFF | 0.196 | 10 |
| DEF | -0.166 | 11 |
| Off Success Rate | 47.0% | 30 |
| DROPBACK | 45.4% | 28 |
| RUSH | 48.8% | 31 |
| Def Success Rate | 33.4% | 6 |
| DROPBACK | 31.9% | 8 |
| RUSH | 35.7% | 8 |
| Net Pts/Drive | 1.04 | 17 |
| OFF | 2.51 | 22 |
| DEF | 1.47 | 33 |
| Net Field Pos | 3.91 | 16 |
| Quality Drive Ratio | 61.5% | 8 |
Texas A&M Off vs LSU Def
| 0.170 | 7 | EPA/RUSH | 10 | -0.133 |
| 0.196 | 14 | EPA/DROPBACK | 19 | -0.153 |
| 50.0% | 31 | QUALITY DRIVE RATE | 27 | 35.8% |
| 4.06 | 23 | Pts/QUALITY DRIVE | 17 | 2.83 |
| 30.27 | 15 | Field Position | 55 | 27.69 |
| -4.6% | 36 | RROE | 12 | -4.3% |
| 0.133 | 19 | Early Downs EPA | 22 | -0.112 |
| 44.3% | 48 | 3rd/4th down Success | 32 | 36.1% |
Texas A&M Def vs LSU Off
| -0.077 | 25 | EPA/RUSH | 72 | -0.005 |
| -0.224 | 8 | EPA/DROPBACK | 64 | 0.006 |
| 30.4% | 11 | QUALITY DRIVE RATE | 60 | 43.5% |
| 3.69 | 83 | PTS/QUALITY DRIVE | 136 | 1.87 |
| 26.36 | 20 | FIELD POSITION | 71 | 28.23 |
| 1.0% | 90 | RROE | 12 | -8.8% |
| -0.059 | 46 | EARLY DOWNS EPA | 101 | -0.068 |
| 25.1% | 1 | 3rd/4th down Success | 99 | 38.4% |
WIN PROB 35.4% PROJ POINTS 20.07 | 🏈 | |
| 27 | 0.165 | EPA Margin |
| 71 | -0.010 | OFF |
| 8 | -0.175 | DEF |
| 107 | 39.5% | Off Success Rate |
| 85 | 39.6% | DROPBACK |
| 116 | 39.5% | RUSH |
| 33 | 38.3% | Def Success Rate |
| 40 | 37.2% | DROPBACK |
| 35 | 39.9% | RUSH |
| 88 | -0.35 | Net Pts/Drive |
| 132 | 0.90 | OFF |
| 15 | 1.25 | DEF |
| 61 | 0.54 | Net Field Pos |
| 32 | 55.1% | Quality Drive Ratio |
