2025 Advanced Stats Previews
Compare college football teams head-to-head with detailed analytics
🏈 | WIN PROB 60.8% PROJ POINTS 27.30 | |
| EPA Margin | 0.334 | 8 |
| OFF | 0.178 | 13 |
| DEF | -0.156 | 9 |
| Off Success Rate | 46.7% | 32 |
| DROPBACK | 44.4% | 39 |
| RUSH | 48.5% | 31 |
| Def Success Rate | 37.3% | 21 |
| DROPBACK | 37.5% | 37 |
| RUSH | 37.9% | 15 |
| Net Pts/Drive | 0.99 | 18 |
| OFF | 2.52 | 24 |
| DEF | 1.53 | 41 |
| Net Field Pos | 2.01 | 34 |
| Quality Drive Ratio | 60.6% | 18 |
Texas A&M Off vs LSU Def
| 0.170 | 4 | EPA/RUSH | 22 | -0.062 |
| 0.165 | 17 | EPA/DROPBACK | 17 | -0.132 |
| 50.0% | 33 | QUALITY DRIVE RATE | 25 | 34.4% |
| 4.20 | 11 | Pts/QUALITY DRIVE | 23 | 2.80 |
| 28.81 | 35 | Field Position | 17 | 25.86 |
| -3.4% | 52 | RROE | 33 | -3.1% |
| 0.193 | 9 | Early Downs EPA | 33 | -0.111 |
| 42.7% | 64 | 3rd/4th down Success | 50 | 38.3% |
Texas A&M Def vs LSU Off
| -0.096 | 9 | EPA/RUSH | 72 | -0.004 |
| -0.176 | 10 | EPA/DROPBACK | 34 | 0.105 |
| 32.2% | 18 | QUALITY DRIVE RATE | 43 | 47.5% |
| 3.98 | 107 | PTS/QUALITY DRIVE | 136 | 1.81 |
| 26.80 | 44 | FIELD POSITION | 87 | 26.96 |
| -0.9% | 59 | RROE | 7 | -9.6% |
| -0.016 | 79 | EARLY DOWNS EPA | 70 | -0.007 |
| 26.4% | 3 | 3rd/4th down Success | 51 | 44.9% |
WIN PROB 39.2% PROJ POINTS 21.39 | 🏈 | |
| 29 | 0.167 | EPA Margin |
| 48 | 0.052 | OFF |
| 15 | -0.116 | DEF |
| 65 | 43.4% | Off Success Rate |
| 35 | 45.1% | DROPBACK |
| 119 | 41.1% | RUSH |
| 50 | 39.9% | Def Success Rate |
| 52 | 38.6% | DROPBACK |
| 60 | 41.9% | RUSH |
| 72 | -0.06 | Net Pts/Drive |
| 123 | 1.03 | OFF |
| 12 | 1.09 | DEF |
| 46 | 1.09 | Net Field Pos |
| 30 | 56.9% | Quality Drive Ratio |
