2025 Advanced Stats Previews
Compare college football teams head-to-head with detailed analytics
🏈 | WIN PROB 18.0% PROJ POINTS 17.16 | |
| EPA Margin | -0.083 | 87 |
| OFF | -0.032 | 80 |
| DEF | 0.051 | 93 |
| Off Success Rate | 41.9% | 82 |
| DROPBACK | 42.6% | 51 |
| RUSH | 40.9% | 109 |
| Def Success Rate | 49.5% | 134 |
| DROPBACK | 46.3% | 126 |
| RUSH | 52.6% | 134 |
| Net Pts/Drive | -1.59 | 132 |
| OFF | 1.34 | 109 |
| DEF | 2.93 | 133 |
| Net Field Pos | -3.37 | 123 |
| Quality Drive Ratio | 39.6% | 124 |
UCLA Off vs USC Def
| -0.062 | 99 | EPA/RUSH | 50 | -0.012 |
| -0.001 | 70 | EPA/DROPBACK | 20 | -0.134 |
| 31.3% | 121 | QUALITY DRIVE RATE | 68 | 42.2% |
| 3.55 | 63 | Pts/QUALITY DRIVE | 53 | 3.34 |
| 26.32 | 120 | Field Position | 41 | 27.23 |
| -3.3% | 48 | RROE | 86 | 0.7% |
| -0.080 | 106 | Early Downs EPA | 98 | 0.023 |
| 40.2% | 86 | 3rd/4th down Success | 54 | 39.0% |
UCLA Def vs USC Off
| 0.065 | 111 | EPA/RUSH | 15 | 0.129 |
| 0.076 | 100 | EPA/DROPBACK | 4 | 0.276 |
| 52.4% | 123 | QUALITY DRIVE RATE | 2 | 59.1% |
| 4.76 | 135 | PTS/QUALITY DRIVE | 23 | 4.10 |
| 29.70 | 112 | FIELD POSITION | 121 | 26.28 |
| -0.5% | 64 | RROE | 43 | -3.8% |
| 0.116 | 128 | EARLY DOWNS EPA | 13 | 0.153 |
| 52.4% | 135 | 3rd/4th down Success | 6 | 52.2% |
WIN PROB 82.0% PROJ POINTS 37.66 | 🏈 | |
| 11 | 0.322 | EPA Margin |
| 6 | 0.238 | OFF |
| 31 | -0.084 | DEF |
| 16 | 48.9% | Off Success Rate |
| 6 | 49.3% | DROPBACK |
| 34 | 48.5% | RUSH |
| 108 | 44.3% | Def Success Rate |
| 69 | 39.8% | DROPBACK |
| 129 | 49.4% | RUSH |
| 14 | 1.17 | Net Pts/Drive |
| 7 | 2.98 | OFF |
| 68 | 1.81 | DEF |
| 85 | -0.95 | Net Field Pos |
| 21 | 58.1% | Quality Drive Ratio |
